J
jimharvey1
Guest
I was just curious if anyone had heard what the MoCo did in the 2012 motors (if anything) to preclude the problem with the crankshaft runout that has occurred (primarily, from what I understand in motors that have been big-bored or modified for higher output) in the twin-cams in the past. Anyone have anything on this? I'm glad to see that they are pumping up the 96" to a 103" as having ridden both...,well, dispite what you are told...SIZE DOES MATTER and it makes a difference in performance and overall satisfaction.
I'm also curious if the factory-stock 103's are the thigh-scorchers that the 96's were or if anything (other than re-routing the pipe under the swingarm) has been done to eliminate the ultra-lean mixture that they are required to have to meet EPA.
What's the outlook on a big-bore V-twin or (better yet) a 4 or 6 cylinder water cooled touring bike in HD's future? (I'd buy one in a split second!)
I'm also curious if the factory-stock 103's are the thigh-scorchers that the 96's were or if anything (other than re-routing the pipe under the swingarm) has been done to eliminate the ultra-lean mixture that they are required to have to meet EPA.
What's the outlook on a big-bore V-twin or (better yet) a 4 or 6 cylinder water cooled touring bike in HD's future? (I'd buy one in a split second!)