I do not see that the traffic here reflects a "true" 80,000 member constituency. My intention is not to engage in a spitting contest, but simply to drop my 2 cents in, for consideration.
Dobeck's participation was never provided by a "public relations" rep, but by core company folks. Such folks have actual, chartered "work" duties. Such duties could be a bit more demanding. Or, a cost vs. benefit analysis has indicated that direct involvement with this forum does not meet the necessary criteria for "active" investment.
It used to be that a day did not go by where someone was not being counseled to install a Dobeck product, or instruction was given to optimize engine performance with a Dobeck tweak, or some such. Now days, what is heard is "Dobeck? Meh. There are better products out there." There may well be better products out there. But if you were Dobeck, how much "active" interest would you show around here, with that attitude offered regularly?
I've said my piece. I do not intend to offend, just to state what I have seen. I have not posted much, since the kerfuffle of the recent past. However, I do check in at least once per day, to see if there is any contribution I could make, or learning I could obtain. I appreciate this board, and will continue to do as I have done. Such as it is.
I could be wrong, but I believe that Dobeck is still a forum sponsor. Again, if their products or support truly are bad, run them up the flag pole and chew their behinds. If not, ease up a little bit. I have read this thread, putting myself in Dobeck's position, and have felt a bit of pain, so I spoke. If it is against the current grain, I can accept that. But, I have put in "my" 2 cents.
Rich P