B-1B_Guy
Junior Member
re: Hillside/Woods 103" build
Rick,
Hmmm.......good question. IMO, the 255 is a good torque cam but it falls off too early. Now, my statement is based soley off of the hundreds of dyno charts I've researched prior to selecting my new cams (and the fact that I'm currently running the 255). I use dyno charts as a base....opionions, experience, and friend's feedback matters more to me than any chart. With that being said.....I chose the Woods cams based on their dyno charts and several recommendations from others that are running their cams. A buddy of mine with a 103 is pulling 122HP/123TQ with hillside heads, modded TFI and a TW-7H cam.
I like the 255's, they pull hard down low and that is all that 99% of us want in a bagger. I'm the other 1%............
Rick,
Hmmm.......good question. IMO, the 255 is a good torque cam but it falls off too early. Now, my statement is based soley off of the hundreds of dyno charts I've researched prior to selecting my new cams (and the fact that I'm currently running the 255). I use dyno charts as a base....opionions, experience, and friend's feedback matters more to me than any chart. With that being said.....I chose the Woods cams based on their dyno charts and several recommendations from others that are running their cams. A buddy of mine with a 103 is pulling 122HP/123TQ with hillside heads, modded TFI and a TW-7H cam.
I like the 255's, they pull hard down low and that is all that 99% of us want in a bagger. I'm the other 1%............