And then you can mount the sensor in a more indicative place.
You mean by moving the sending unit to the input on the oil cooler?
I still don't know how much difference it would really make being indicative.
I have not yet educated myself on how the oil pump works and how the oil flows (pathways) in the engine of my ultra. You may get a more consistant measurement from the inlet of the cooler but I don't know if that is a good representation of "the hottest spot" in the engine.
I looked at some of the posts on the oil coolers: Jagg says about a 20 degree difference, but there was a post/link to an article where some folks installed it an measured temps at multiple points. The best they got looks to me to be a drop of about 8-9 degrees but they also mention a drop of 17 degrees using a Daytona TT TCFI sensor. I don't know what how or where the Daytona works. If it were a solid 20 degree drop, I think I could talk myself into buying a cooler. 8-9 degrees--I don't know if it is worth it.
Again, looking at Smitty's posts, are we just fooling ourselves? I mean how much "engine damage" am I preventing if I am riding in the heat of summer with and oil cooler that drops the temp by 8-9 degrees? By the calibrations on my McEwan gauge, I doubt it would be able to register the difference, visually. Especially at the high end (which is where you would want it).
I think maybe the best I can do is keep changing the oil every 3000 miles with special emphasis on the doing so in the summer. My motor is what I consider "stock" even with the TFI and Stage 1 air cleaner. Maybe the 103 or the 110 you would need to get all the cooling you could.
What I would think would really work is to lift the bike 1" and add a cooling fin plate to the oil pan. Put a gallon of distilled water and a DC pump in a saddle bag and run some lines to a few of the "mist tips" and spray the engine with a light mist in the high heat of summer. But then I should go out and buy a water cooled engine...
