This cracks me up so I'll throw something out there that'll get me flamed for sure.
The majority in this thread are in agreement that the more lights, the better for safety reasons. However, quite a while back, I started a thread asking about headlight modulators for the exact same reason - safety and increased visibility. The majority in that thread thought modulators were not a good idea since they tend to irritate traffic both oncoming and ahead.
So, I ask you, what's the difference?
I think deep down this smacks of a Harley vs. Metric thing. Headlight modulators are just seen on way more metric bikes than Harleys so they are perceived as not being as cool as extra running lights.
Just my 2 cents worth!
I would think the disagreement would NOT be based on a "cool factor", or any comparison to a metric, and truthfully, I don't see that happening.
That said, I maintain that ANY improvement to viability that improves our safely while riding is something to be seriously considered, metric based or not!
I think deep down this smacks of a Harley vs. Metric thing. Headlight modulators are just seen on way more metric bikes than Harleys so they are perceived as not being as cool as extra running lights.
On my Road King they are called "Passing Lights". It seems stupid to me because to turn them on for passing you need to flip a switch on the right hand side. That hand is busy then. I just leave them on all the time, I figure the more light I have the better I will be seen. When I turn on the high beams they go off. I wish they would stay on then, they light the sides of the road better so I can spot the deer easier.